Deserving or Not Deserving?

We did this with baseball's Cy Young Awards back in November, and now we will apply it to College Basketball.

Which team is most worthy of a bid in the NCAA Tournament:

• Team A: 13-5 record, 4-2 in conference, 3-5 vs RPI Top 100, Strength of Schedule(SoS) Rank: 26, RPI 29, Conference RPI: 3
• Team B: 15-4 record, 9-1 in conference, 4-2 vs RPI Top 100, SoS Rank: 79, RPI 20, Conference RPI: 6
• Team C: 14-4 record, 6-0 in conference, 6-3 vs RPI Top 100, SoS Rank: 53, RPI 32, Conference RPI: 2
• Team D: 16-1 record, 5-0 in conference, 5-1 vs RPI Top 100, SoS Rank: 245, RPI 44, Conference RPI: 9
• Team E: 13-6 record, 5-4 in conference, 3-4 vs RPI Top 100, SoS Rank: 140, RPI 100, Conference RPI: 7
• Team F: 16-6 record, 9-2 in conference, 4-4 vs RPI Top 100, SoS Rank: 103, RPI 45, Conference RPI: 10

Which of these teams is most deserving of an at-large berth? And isn't harder to determine who is in and who is out with the school names removed? To me, all but Team E should receive at-large selections, and Team D gets by only becuase of their outstanding record vs the top 100

The teams:
Team A: Maryland
Team B: Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Team C: West Virginia
Team D: George Washington
Team E: Southern California
Team F: UNC-Wilmington

Unoffiicial RPI from: http://kenpom.com/rpi.php