Friday, March 28, 2008

More of John Leopold's Big Government

For all of those apologists who still say John Leopold is a "small government conservative," for the love of god explain this:
Rude cabbies may need a new gig if a law requiring them to be "courteous" passes the County Council.

A bill proposed by County Executive John R. Leopold would revamp taxicab regulation in Anne Arundel, pushing out solo operations in favor of centralized companies and imposing more restrictions on how cabbies can conduct business.
So naturally this brand of "small government conservatism" means unneeded, unnecessary, and unwarranted regulation of small businesses:

Tightening rules on a taxicab licenses is "really a consumer protection bill," explained Alan Friedman, Mr. Leopold's director of government relations. "We wanted to give people the feeling that there was structure, that if there was a problem, there was a company to handle it."

County officials have received complaints about "cell phone cabs," said Mr. Friedman, which he described as "basically one guy with a car and a cell phone."

The one-cab operations float around the county, and some consumers allege the operations are unreliable and unreachable when complaints arise. By restricting taxi cab licenses to only companies that own at least three cabs, then requiring companies to operate 24 hours a day and set up a physical office in Anne Arundel, the county can reassure riders and let the12 companies in the county police their own drivers.

I am completely puzzled and perplexed as to why this is such an issue for County Government. With all of the problems that are going on in Anne Arundel County (school funding, a school board commission debacle, lower revenues, higher taxes and fees, permitting problems) I can't imagine that there is a real need for such comprehensive taxi reform here in the county. I'm not saying that there should be no regulation of taxis in Anne Arundel County, but in what harm is there in sticking with the status quo? Why is it so bad that independent operations have an alternative business model? Why should independent taxi companies be forced by Leopold's intrusive government to expand or go out of business? And what harm will be brought to consumers who may have their choice of cab companies reduced through this legislation.

Maybe it's just because I never use taxis, but this legislation seems silly, short-sighted, and unnecessary at best. Beyond that, sadly it is just another way for John Leopold to implement his big-government, high regulation, high fee "management" style at the detriment to the taxpayers and consumers of Anne Arundel County.

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Jerry Shandrowsky said...

John Leopold is a complete phony. How this man manages to pull the wool over the eyes of so many, totally perplexes me. I look forward to the day the man makes his exit from politics.

9:49 AM  
Blogger n3pla2000 said...

I work for a taxi company here in Anne Arundel County. The company I work for started as a single taxi operation, expanded to three cabs in the first few months and now has roughly 10 cabs. Some of these cabs are owned by the driver who drives it some are company owned. All of us are courteous, but occasionally customers treat us as though we are stupid because we drive cabs. I have already had to tell a customer "shut up or get out".

Customers treat us like dirt often. Rarely do they apologize to us. I am on time, every time, except when either traffic delays me or the prior customer does. This fact can not be changed. Customers tell me I am on time more often then the three big companies. I basically get my own work and take my own calls as if I were an independent. I have thought of starting my own company on a shoe string, then adding more cabs. If this goes through that won't happen.

4:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Site Feed